Yeah, yeah, absolutely. I think that's the way that Blizzard has always worked. this sort of WOW WOTLK Classic Gold a bottom up approach on what the games we'd like us to create and bring forward are and that's what's most important. This is so integral and part of the DNA of Blizzard I'm not sure how Blizzard has been successful in any other way.
You know, I think the development team was put in charge of the company in the wake of Mike And I believe that the fact that we promoted Ray Gresko to be the chief development officer is a testament to not just how important Blizzard believes in, but it is also an signal to us that Activision Blizzard understands what's important to Blizzard.
I am a huge fan of World of Warcraft and have been addicted to it in a manner that I've not experienced with any other Blizzard game, and I'm sure the same is true for many others. It's clear that creating new IP works for your company, but you have the classic games that gamers want more of, like StarCraft, like World of Warcraft . What's your perspective on making something new, while still relying heavily on the old? Do you plan to play with the older game similar to what you did with a wild classic or are there new possibilities in StarCraft and as well as what's to come?
It's true that it's a blessing to be able to have four major IPs, which include World of Warcraft , StarCraft, World of Warcraft , and, now, World of Warcraft . Also, you can find Heroes which is more of a subset amalgamation of all of the kind of borrowings from all the pieces of the IPs.And I believe that's quite powerful. In reference to a prior question where I discussed these IPs and the ability of many of them in supporting various gaming experiences We're always looking for.
I personally think that there are usually characters and fantastic stories and plenty of games and game experiences we can create with the existing games we have. There is plenty of room and plenty of room for this. However, I do think that at the same time, you should be thinking of new ideas and also think about new ideas.
And so both are important. Fans want greater StarCraft games. I'm a huge fan and would like to see more StarCraft games. Fans want additional World of Warcraft games. I'm a fan, I too want more World of Warcraft games. Fans are looking for new IP for their games, and me too.
The things are discussed in terms of "What IP we should use and how we should think over it?" The team has plenty of decision-making authority. We also have to consider what games and IPs the teams are most enthusiastic about. What IP is suitable for different types of games.
I'm thinking that the fact we have these IPs with these stories, time spans or any other story about games that exist with cheap WOTLK Gold them -- I consider it an asset. I don't think of that as a threat. I think the ability and the desire to create innovative games is important, and we've proven that we're capable of doing it with World of Warcraft , and we'll be proving it again in the near future.